Ning V/S Kwiqq [kwiqq]
Posted on | March 14, 2007 | View Comments


I’ve been questioned about this by friends and colleagues. So I thought I’d organise my thoughts in a blogpost. Firstly there is no Ning versus kwiqq. We are two companies with totally different business models and customer bases.
In my mind Ning solves the basic problem of moving a real world community or interest group into cyberspace cheaply,easily and flexibly. An individual or group can build a site, grow it and even make money from advertising. While in Kwiqq we serve organisations that want to turn a large user base into an online community.
The idea behind Kwiqq?
Simply that organisations such as corporations, charities, sports clubs, churchs etc. needed help to navigate the ‘wild west’ the of emerging social web and that it was a massive market. We built our software to fill this niche. And also add features depending on need. For instance a present client in the travel industry needs a voting system to fit a particular scenario so we built it in. We take care of all the problems in regards to hosting, support and moderation at Kwiqq Labs or via our local partners.
That Kwiqq can help repersonalise large organisations for their members really excites us.
What’s so special about kwiqq?
Apart from the fact that I made it?
When we built the software I aimed to maximise flexibility and creative potential while adhering to the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid) and be browser neutral.
As everything is CSS designers can totally change the look.
What annoyed me about myspace was that single long page that took forever to load. Kwiqq lets our users add as many pages to their profile as they like and each page can have multiple tools in various layouts. We can predefine optional templates and provide skins. User generated skinning is an upcoming feature.
This is the Page Layout Tool.


We have done, and will regularly do, usability tests. An amazingly insightful process! (Thanks Steve Krug). We are also working on the code for speed optimisation.
Finally; we have b2b product. We meet and work with our clients face to face to ensure that they, the users and us are in a win-win-win situation.
We haven’t raised VC money simply because we don’t need it yet. An Angel Investor and a bank loan have got us up and running. Ning has spent $9 million over 1.5 years and has some high profile people on board such as Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Netscape. We are experimenting with Ning, so should everyone, it’s free!
To summarise both Ning and Kwiqq facilitate online social networking. But through very different business models. We are complementary not competitive. So next time I’m asked at a networking event: “have you heard about Ning?” I’ll refer them to this blog
Check out the Kwiqq Team and our case study page.
Comments
-
http://www.inuda.com Jonathan Markwell
-
http://www.kwiqq.com Raj Anand
-
http://www.bestengagingcommunities.com Mukund Mohan



buy now